intro alpha
This commit is contained in:
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ floor maps. This combination of highly different sensor types is also known as s
|
||||
|
||||
Here, probabilistic methods like particle- or Kalman filters are often used to approximate a probability
|
||||
distribution describing describing the pedestrian's possible whereabouts.
|
||||
|
||||
This procedure can be separated into two probabilistic models:
|
||||
The transition model represents the dynamics of the pedestrian
|
||||
and predicts the next accessible locations,
|
||||
@@ -25,55 +24,46 @@ In our previous work we were able to present such a localisation system based on
|
||||
sensors including the phone's barometer \cite{Ebner-15}.
|
||||
|
||||
In pedestrian navigation, the human movement underlies the characteristics of walking speed and walking direction.
|
||||
Additionally, environmental restrictions need to be considered as well, for example, walking through walls is in
|
||||
most cases impossible. Therefore, incorporating environmental knowledge is a necessary and gainful step.
|
||||
Additionally, environmental restrictions need to be considered as well, for example, walking through walls is in most cases impossible. Therefore, incorporating environmental knowledge is a necessary and gainful step.
|
||||
Like other systems, we are using a graph-based approach to sample only valid locations.
|
||||
The unique feature of our approach is the way in how we model the human movement.
|
||||
This is done by using random walks on a graph, which are based upon the heading of the
|
||||
pedestrian.
|
||||
Despite very good results
|
||||
Despite very good results and a robust position estimation, the system presented in \cite{Ebner-15} suffers from two drawbacks, we want to solve within this work.
|
||||
|
||||
However, the system presented in \cite{Ebner-15} suffers from two major drawbacks, we want to solve within this work.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\commentByFrank{unser unique feature ist also, dass es nicht geht? :P so liest sich der absatz}
|
||||
|
||||
Firstly, the transition model of our past \commentByFrank{previous?} approach uses discrete floors.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{floor-changes. die floors sind immernoch discrete}.
|
||||
Although the overall systems prevoides viable results, it does not resemble real-world floor changes.
|
||||
Firstly, the transition model of our previous approach uses discrete floor-changes.
|
||||
Although the overall systems provides viable results, it does not resemble real-world floor changes.
|
||||
Especially the barometric sensor is affected due to its continuous pressure measurements.
|
||||
The discrete model restricts the barometer to exploit its full potential.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{komischer satz, schraenkt ein um das ganze potential zu nutzen? wie waers mit:
|
||||
prevents using the baromters full potential?}
|
||||
|
||||
The discrete model prevents the barometers full potential.
|
||||
It could further be shown that a correct estimation strongly depends on the quality of $z$-transitions.
|
||||
To address this problem we extended the graph by realistically shaped stairs, allowing a step-wise transition
|
||||
in the $z$-direction.
|
||||
|
||||
Secondly, the heading for modeling the pedestrian's walking behaviour is calculated between two adjacent nodes.
|
||||
Secondly, the heading for modelling the pedestrian's walking behaviour is calculated between two adjacent nodes.
|
||||
This restricts the transition to perform only \SI{45}{\degree} turns. In most scenarios this assumption performs
|
||||
well, since the... However, walking sharp turns and ... is not
|
||||
\commentByToni{Ich denke hier kann Frank E. noch bissle was schreiben, oder?}
|
||||
\commentByToni{Ich denke hier kann Frank E. noch bissle was schreiben, oder?}
|
||||
\commentByFrank{ja das werde ich noch anpassen, dass es stimmt und die probleme beschreibt}
|
||||
|
||||
The problem of localization can be simplified by assuming a person navigation.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{???}
|
||||
Such applications are used to navigate a pedestrian to his desired destination.
|
||||
So, based on this assumption the starting point, which is the current position of the pedestrian,
|
||||
as well as the destination are known beforehand.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{die aktuelle post ist nicht vorher bekannt, jedenfalls verwenden wir es nicht so}
|
||||
To improve the complex problem of localising a person indoors, prior knowledge given by a pedestrian navigation can be used.
|
||||
Such applications are used to navigate a user to his desired destination.
|
||||
This limits the unpredictability of human movement to a certain degree.
|
||||
So, based on this assumption the destination is known beforehand and the starting point is the current estimated position of the pedestrian.
|
||||
Regarding a graph-based transition model, one could suggest to use the shortest route between start and destination as the user's most-likely-to-walk path.
|
||||
By incorporating this prior knowledge into the state transition step, a new state can be sampled in a more targeted manner.
|
||||
However, for regular tessellated (grid) graphs, as used in \cite{Ebner-15}, this often leads to paths running very unnatural alongside walls.
|
||||
Therefore, we present a method that detects walls using the inverted graph (representing walls and obstacles) and a nearest-neighbour search.
|
||||
|
||||
Regarding a graph-based transition model, one could suggest to calculate the shortest path
|
||||
between start and destination. However, this often leads to paths running very unnatural alongside walls.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{zumindest bei unserem graphen layout. auf nem voronoi koennte es sogar besser sein}
|
||||
Additionally, the human walking behaviour is highly affected by visual distractions, comfort, disorientation
|
||||
and many other factors. Therefore, we present a novel method for pedestrian navigation by using \todo{XXX} methods
|
||||
to calculate a preferably realistic path:
|
||||
areas near a wall are less likely to be chosen for the path then a door or a small hallway. ... probability map/graph ...
|
||||
\commentByToni{Wissen ja noch nicht was wir hier genau nehmen, deswegen erstmal leer}
|
||||
to address the problem of walking on a corridor with higher probability ... a method for detecting doors and
|
||||
reducing the proabability of walking alongside walls will be presentend within this work...
|
||||
In order to express that areas near walls are less likely to be chosen for walking, a probabilistic weight is assigned to every node of the graph.
|
||||
This allows a variety of options for integrating additional knowledge about the environment and enables us to address another problem:
|
||||
Walking through a door has a lower probability than remaining on the corridor, since only a few nodes are representing it.
|
||||
This can be tackled by making such areas more likely.
|
||||
Therefore, a novel approach for detecting doors using again the inverted graph and the principal component analysis (PCA) \cite{Hotelling1933} is presented within this work.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, it is now possible to calculate more natural and realistic paths using the weighted graph. We introduce two different methods which make use of the given destination and thereby provide a targeted movement.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The work is structured as follows...
|
||||
|
||||
%Additionally, the human walking behaviour is highly affected by visual distractions, comfort, disorientation and many other factors.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2559,3 +2559,11 @@ year = {2014}
|
||||
@inproceedings{IPIN2015,
|
||||
title = {Multisensor 3D Indoor Localisation}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Hotelling1933,
|
||||
abstract = {The problem is stated in detail, a method of analysis is derived and its geometrical meaning shown, methods of solution are illustrated and certain derivative problems are discussed. (To be concluded in October issue.) },
|
||||
author = {Hotelling, H},
|
||||
title = {{Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into Principal Components. Jour. Educ. Psych., 24, 417-441, 498-520}},
|
||||
year = {1933}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user