added new gfx (path2 compare)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -103,18 +103,20 @@ The estimation of BS looks way more realistic and adapts better to the ground tr
|
||||
%For example \SI{50}{} particles and \SI{25}{} sample realisations are providing reliable estimations similar to above experiments, though the risk of losing track is higher.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.175\textwidth}
|
||||
\input{gfx/eval/interval_path2_good/path2_interval_good}
|
||||
\caption{}
|
||||
\label{fig:int_path2_a}
|
||||
\end{subfigure}
|
||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.175\textwidth}
|
||||
\input{gfx/eval/interval_path2_bad/path2_interval}
|
||||
\caption{}
|
||||
\label{fig:int_path2_b}
|
||||
\end{subfigure}
|
||||
\caption{a) Exemplary results for path 2 where BS (blue) and filtering (green) using 2500 particles and 500 sample realisations. b) A situation where BS smoothing was not able to improve the filtering results. Two main factors are causing this: an initial position within a detached room and inaccurate pressure readings given by the Galaxy S5.}
|
||||
\label{fig:int_path3_comp}
|
||||
%\begin{subfigure}{0.175\textwidth}
|
||||
% \input{gfx/eval/interval_path2_good/path2_interval_good}
|
||||
% \caption{}
|
||||
% \label{fig:int_path2_a}
|
||||
%\end{subfigure}
|
||||
%\begin{subfigure}{0.175\textwidth}
|
||||
% \input{gfx/eval/interval_path2_bad/path2_interval}
|
||||
% \caption{}
|
||||
% \label{fig:int_path2_b}
|
||||
%\end{subfigure}
|
||||
%\caption{a) Exemplary results for path 2 where BS (blue) and filtering (green) using 2500 particles and 500 sample realisations. b) A situation where BS smoothing was not able to improve the filtering results. Two main factors are causing this: an initial position within a detached room and inaccurate pressure readings given by the Galaxy S5.}
|
||||
\input{gfx/eval/interval_path2_compare/path2_interval_compare}
|
||||
\caption{left) Exemplary results for path 2 where BS (blue) and filtering (green) using 2500 particles and 500 sample realisations. right) A situation where BS smoothing was not able to improve the filtering results. Two main factors are causing this: an initial position within a detached room and inaccurate pressure readings given by the Galaxy S5.}
|
||||
\label{fig:int_path2_comp}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
Despite the very good outcomes provided by both interval smoother, there are some rare situations in which smoothing does not improve the filtered estimation or even improves the visual path.
|
||||
For example fig. \ref{fig:int_path3_b} depicts such a situation for path 3 using BS and measurements provided by the Galaxy S5.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user