current TeX
This commit is contained in:
@@ -542,10 +542,15 @@
|
||||
Removing this (valid) information will increase the error for such situations.
|
||||
|
||||
However, incorporating additional knowledge provided by virtual \docAP{}s (see section \ref{sec:vap}) mitigated this issues.
|
||||
If only one out of six virtual networks is seen, this observation is likely to be erroneous, no matter
|
||||
what the corresponding signal strength indicates. This approach improved the location estimation especially
|
||||
for areas where a transmitter was hardly seen within the reference measurements and its optimization is thus
|
||||
expected to be inaccurate.
|
||||
If e.g. only one out of six virtual networks is seen, this observation is likely to be erroneous, no matter
|
||||
what the corresponding signal strength indicates.
|
||||
As those occasions are relatively seldom, the impact is a minor one.
|
||||
Nevertheless, depending on the used prediction model, a handful of major estimation errors were prevented.
|
||||
Additionally, among all examined models and walks, there was none where this approached lead to increased error values.
|
||||
|
||||
%This approach improved the location estimation especially
|
||||
%for areas where a transmitter was hardly seen within the reference measurements and its optimization is thus
|
||||
%expected to be inaccurate.
|
||||
|
||||
Using a smaller $\sigma$ or a stricter exponential distribution for the model vs. scan comparison in \refeq{eq:wifiProb}
|
||||
had a positive effect on the misclassification error for some of the walks, but also slightly increased the overall estimation error.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user