current TeX

This commit is contained in:
2017-05-08 19:30:53 +02:00
parent 7021034e6d
commit 7dece06f8a
4 changed files with 36 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ ADD_DEFINITIONS(
-fstack-protector-all
-g3
-O0
-O2
-march=native
-DWITH_TESTS

View File

@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ void paperOutputs() {
}
/** plot wifi eval results */
if (1 == 1) {
if (1 == 0) {
WiFiFingerprints fps;
fps.load(Settings::fCalib);
@@ -1254,11 +1254,11 @@ int main(void) {
Floorplan::IndoorMap* map = Floorplan::Reader::readFromFile(Settings::fMap);
plotAllWalks(map);
//plotAllWalks(map);
//compareAll();
//compareAll();
return 0;
//return 0;
//testWAF();
//sleep(1);
@@ -1266,7 +1266,7 @@ int main(void) {
//const float rssi = LogDistanceModel::distanceToRssi(-100, 0, 999);
//int i = 0; (void) i;
paperOutputs(); return 0;
// paperOutputs(); return 0;
//showFingerprintsFor(Settings::fMap, Settings::fCalib, "D8:84:66:4A:4A:D0");
//showModelFor(Settings::fMap, Settings::wifiEachOptParPos_multimodel, "D8:84:66:4A:4A:D0");
@@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ int main(void) {
// wifi vs ground-truth distance error
if (1 == 0) {
if (1 == 1) {
std::vector<std::string> files = {
Settings::path1a, Settings::path1b,
@@ -1486,9 +1486,26 @@ int main(void) {
std::cout << "num scans: " << numScans << std::endl;
// stats as table
// different VAP settings
if (1 == 1) {
EvalWiFiPaths ewp(Settings::fMap);
ewp.vap->setMinOccurences(2);
ewp.loadModel(Settings::wifiEachOptPar, "0");
ewp.walks(files, gtIndices);
ewp.vap->setMinOccurences(0);
ewp.loadModel(Settings::wifiEachOptPar, "1");
ewp.walks(files, gtIndices);
sleep(10000);
}
// stats as table
if (1 == 0) {
EvalWiFiPaths ewp(Settings::fMap);
ewp.loadModel(Settings::wifiAllFixed, "0");
ewp.walks(files, gtIndices);
@@ -1514,7 +1531,7 @@ int main(void) {
}
// stats as GFX
if (1 == 1) {
if (1 == 0) {
EvalWiFiPaths ewp(Settings::fMap);
ewp.loadModel(Settings::wifiAllFixed, "\\noOptEmpiric{}");

View File

@@ -542,10 +542,15 @@
Removing this (valid) information will increase the error for such situations.
However, incorporating additional knowledge provided by virtual \docAP{}s (see section \ref{sec:vap}) mitigated this issues.
If only one out of six virtual networks is seen, this observation is likely to be erroneous, no matter
what the corresponding signal strength indicates. This approach improved the location estimation especially
for areas where a transmitter was hardly seen within the reference measurements and its optimization is thus
expected to be inaccurate.
If e.g. only one out of six virtual networks is seen, this observation is likely to be erroneous, no matter
what the corresponding signal strength indicates.
As those occasions are relatively seldom, the impact is a minor one.
Nevertheless, depending on the used prediction model, a handful of major estimation errors were prevented.
Additionally, among all examined models and walks, there was none where this approached lead to increased error values.
%This approach improved the location estimation especially
%for areas where a transmitter was hardly seen within the reference measurements and its optimization is thus
%expected to be inaccurate.
Using a smaller $\sigma$ or a stricter exponential distribution for the model vs. scan comparison in \refeq{eq:wifiProb}
had a positive effect on the misclassification error for some of the walks, but also slightly increased the overall estimation error.

View File

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
/** evaluate just the wifi error for several given paths */
class EvalWiFiPaths {
private:
public:
Floorplan::IndoorMap* map;
BBox3 mapBBox;