toni/IPIN2016
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

near to final draft

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
toni
2016-05-11 16:30:36 +02:00
parent 8c055bd71d
commit ff56649a5b
9 changed files with 23 additions and 44 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
tex/chapters/filtering.tex
View File

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
While sampling, to-be-walked edges are not chosen uniformly, but depending on a probability $p(\mEdgeAB)$.
The latter depends on several constraints and recent sensor-readings from the smartphone. Using those readings
directly within the transition step provides a more robust posterior distribution. Adding them to the evaluation
instead, would lead to sample impoverishment due to the used Monte Carlo methods \cite{Isard98:CCD}.
instead, would lead to sample impoverishment due to the used MC methods \cite{Isard98:CCD}.
%\commentByFrank{ist das verstaendlich oder schon zu kurz?}
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
%\subsubsection{Activity-Detection}
Additionally we perform a simple activity detection for the pedestrian, able to distinguish between several actions
$\mObsActivity \in \{ \text{unknown}, \text{standing}, \text{walking}, \text{stairs\_up}, \text{stairs\_down} \}$.
$\mObsActivity \in \{ \tt{unknown}, \tt{standing}, \tt{walking}, \tt{stairs\_up}, \tt{stairs\_down} \}$.
%
%\commentByFrank{bei mir ueberlappt aktuell nix, muessten mal testen was besser ist. beim ueberlappen ist das delay halt kuerzer. denke das schon ok.}
%