final version of paper
This commit is contained in:
@@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ For example, in \cite{Platzer:2008} a particle smoother is used to reduce multim
|
||||
|
||||
%smoothing im bezug auf indoor
|
||||
Nevertheless, there are some promising approaches for indoor localisation systems as well.
|
||||
For example \cite{Nurminen2014} deployed a fixed-interval forward-backward smoother to improve the position estimation for non-real-time applications.
|
||||
For example \cite{Nurminen13-PSI} deployed a fixed-interval forward-backward smoother to improve the position estimation for non-real-time applications.
|
||||
They combined \docWIFI{}, step and turn detection, a simple line-of-sight model for floor plan restrictions and the barometric change within a particle filter.
|
||||
The state transition samples a new state based on the heading change, altitude change and a fixed step length.
|
||||
The experiments of \cite{Nurminen2014} clearly emphasise the benefits of smoothing techniques. The estimation error could be decreased significantly.
|
||||
The experiments of \cite{Nurminen13-PSI} clearly emphasise the benefits of smoothing techniques. The estimation error could be decreased significantly.
|
||||
However, a fixed-lag smoother was discussed only in theory.
|
||||
|
||||
In the work of \cite{Paul2009} both fixed-interval and fixed-lag smoothing were presented.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user