final version of paper
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
||||
Within this work a novel approach for utilizing \commentByFrank{utiliSing?} the forward-backward smoother and backward simulation to problems of indoor localisation was presented.
|
||||
Within this work a novel approach for utilising the forward-backward smoother and backward simulation to problems of indoor localisation was presented.
|
||||
Both were implemented as fixed-lag and fixed-interval smoother.
|
||||
It was shown that smoothing methods are able to decrease the estimation error and improving \commentByFrank{are able to decrease ... and improve. ING weg?} the overall localisation.
|
||||
Especially fixed-lag smoothing is a great tool for runtime support by reducing timely \commentByFrank{wieder} errors and improving the overall estimation with affordable costs.
|
||||
It was shown that smoothing methods are able to decrease the estimation error and improve the overall localisation.
|
||||
Especially fixed-lag smoothing is a great tool for runtime support by reducing temporal errors and improving the overall estimation with affordable costs.
|
||||
However, a fixed-lag smoother is not able to change the lag dynamically, as its name suggests.
|
||||
Therefore, a dynamic-lag smoother could be able to further improve the estimation by considering higher lags in critical areas.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user