fixed some missing macros
removed path from intro/related/filtering
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,10 +6,10 @@
|
||||
Determining a position indoors is a challenging task.
|
||||
Besides the complex architecture of many buildings, high accuracy needs to be achieved, especially for buildings with many small separated areas like shopping malls or office blocks.
|
||||
In recent years, many different systems were presented to meet those requirements.
|
||||
Especially Wi-Fi positioning and pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) are very popular solutions.
|
||||
Especially \docWIFI{} positioning and pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) are very popular solutions.
|
||||
Approaches based on PDR try to estimate the current position given the previous position and thus require an initial state.
|
||||
However, this allows for cumulative errors and leads to an erroneous position estimation within a very short period.
|
||||
By incorporating the absolute position information of Wi-Fi this drift can be corrected.
|
||||
By incorporating the absolute position information of \docWIFI{} this drift can be corrected.
|
||||
Additional improvements can be achieved by using environmental information about walls and obstacles provided by a floor map.
|
||||
|
||||
In most cases, probabilistic methods are used to incorporate those highly different sensor types.
|
||||
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ For example, a barometer can be used to determine the probability of being on a
|
||||
|
||||
Despite the many advances made in the last years, nearly all systems suffer from more or less the same problems.
|
||||
Like mentioned before, PDR suffers from an accumulating bias,
|
||||
the signal of Wi-Fi gets attenuated by walls
|
||||
the signal of \docWIFI{} gets attenuated by walls
|
||||
%\commentByFrank{falls noch platz ist: noch mehr nachteile :P \docWIFI{} location estimation strongly depends on the quality of the signal-strength estimation model (oder fingerprinting) and the way the smartphone is held}
|
||||
and the barometric pressure is highly affected by weather patterns and humidity
|
||||
%\commentByFrank{spontane fenster/tuer oeffnung}
|
||||
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ This temporal delay worsens the estimate immensely.
|
||||
A solution to recover from such filter divergences faster, involves methods to re-initialize the filtering procedure \cite{Nurminen2014}.
|
||||
However, even this can not completely prevent delays.
|
||||
Another reason for possible time delays are slow sensor updates.
|
||||
For example, most mobile devices restrict the Wi-Fi module to update only every few seconds, to save on battery.
|
||||
For example, most mobile devices restrict the \docWIFI{} module to update only every few seconds, to save on battery.
|
||||
%
|
||||
\begin{figure}[t]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
@@ -72,12 +72,14 @@ Due to inaccurate measurements and a PDR approach for evaluating the movement, t
|
||||
Therefore, the weighted average position is somewhere in-between.
|
||||
Only after the pedestrian turns right, the distribution is again unimodal, since moving through walls is impossible.
|
||||
As one can imagine, this can lead to serious problems in big indoor environments.
|
||||
Such a situation can be improved by incorporating future measurements (e.g. the right turn) or predictive information (e.g. the most likely path) to the filtering procedure \cite{Ebner-16}.
|
||||
Such a situation can be improved by incorporating future measurements (e.g. the right turn)
|
||||
%or predictive information (e.g. the most likely path)
|
||||
to the filtering procedure \cite{Ebner-16}.
|
||||
However, standard filtering methods are not able to use any future information and the possibilities to make a distant forecast are also limited \cite{robotics, Doucet11:ATO, chen2003bayesian}.
|
||||
|
||||
One very promising way to deal with these problems is smoothing.
|
||||
Smoothing methods are able to make use of future measurements for computing their estimation.
|
||||
By running backwards in time, they are also able to remove multimodalities and improve the overall localization result.
|
||||
By running backwards in time, they are also able to remove multimodalities and improve the overall localisation result.
|
||||
Since the problem of navigation, especially the representation of complex movement patterns, results in a non-linear and non-Gaussian state space, this work focuses mainly on smoothing techniques based on the broad class of MC methods.
|
||||
%Of course, this excludes linear procedures like Kalman filtering.
|
||||
Namely, forward-backward smoothing \cite{doucet2000} and backward simulation \cite{Godsill04:MCS}.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user