first draft related work

This commit is contained in:
toni
2016-04-19 18:28:30 +02:00
parent 978ffd89a5
commit 033466111a
5 changed files with 176 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@@ -29,14 +29,33 @@ In recent years, smoothing gets attention mainly in other areas as indoor locali
The early work of \cite{isard1998smoothing} demonstrates the possibilities of smoothing for visual tracking.
They used a combination of the CONDENSATION particle filter with a forward-backward smoother.
Based on this pioneering approach, many different solutions for visual and multi-target tracking have been developed \cite{Perez2004}.
For example, in \cite{Platzer:2008} a particle smoother is used to reduce multimodalities in a blood flow simulation for human vessels. Or \cite{}
Nevertheless, their are some promising approach for indoor localisation systems as well. For example ...
For example, in \cite{Platzer:2008} a particle smoother is used to reduce multimodalities in a blood flow simulation for human vessels. Or \cite{Hu2014} uses a smoother to overcoming the problem of particle impoverishment while predicting the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of equipment (e.g. a Lithium-ion battery).
%smoothing im bezug auf indoor
Smoothing solutions in indoor localisation werden bisher nicht wirklich behandelt. das liegt hauptsächlich daran das es sehr langsam ist \cite{}. es gibt ansätze von ... und ... diese benutzen blah und blah. wir machen das genauso/besser.
Nevertheless, their are some promising approaches for indoor localisation systems as well.
For example \cite{Nurminen2014} deployed a fixed-interval forward-backward smoother to improve the position estimation for non-real-time applications.
They combined Wi-Fi, step and turn detection, a simple line-of-sight model for floor plan restrictions and the barometric change within a particle filter.
The state transition samples a new state based on the heading change, altitude change and a fixed step length.
The experiments of \cite{Nurminen2014} clearly emphasize the benefits of smoothing techniques. The estimation error could be decreased significantly.
However, a fixed-lag smoother was treated only in theory.
In the work of \cite{Paul2009} both fixed-interval and fixed-lag smoothing were presented.
They implemented Wi-Fi, binary infra-red motion sensors, binary foot-switches and a potential field for floor plan restrictions.
Those sensors were incorporated using a sigma-point Kalman filter in combination with a forward-backward smoother.
It was also proven by \cite{Paul2009}, that the fixed-lag smoother is slightly less accurate then the fixed-interval smoother.
As one would expect from the theoretical foundation.
Unfortunately, even a sigma-point Kalman filters is after all just a linearisation and therefore not as flexible and suited for the complex problem of indoor localisation as a non-linear estimator like a particle filter.
\commentByToni{Kann das jemand nochmal verifizieren? Das mit dem Kalman Filter. Danke.}
Additionally, the Wi-Fi RSSI model requires known calibration points and is deployed using a remarkable number of access points for very small spaces.
In our opinion this is not practical and we would further recommend adding a PDR-based transition instead of a random one.
In contrast, the here presented approach is able to use two different smoothing algorithm, both implemented as fixed-interval and fixed-lag versions.
Further, our localisation system presented in \cite{Ebner-16} enables us to walk stairs and therefore going into the third dimension.
Therefore, a regularly tessellated graph is utilized to avoid walls, detecting doors and recognizing stairs.
Within this work, this is additionally supported by a simple classification that detects the activities unknown, standing, walking and walking stairs.
Finally, we incorporate prior navigation knowledge by using syntactically calculated realistic human walking paths \cite{Ebner-16}.
This method makes use of the given destination and thereby provides a more targeted movement.