current TeX
minor code changes
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
\section{Related Work}
|
||||
|
||||
Indoor localization based on \docWIFI{} and received signal strength indications (RSSI) dates back to the year
|
||||
2000 and the work of Bahl and Padmanabhan \cite{radar}. During an one-time offline-phase, a
|
||||
2000 and the work of Bahl and Padmanabhan \cite{radar}. During a one-time offline-phase, a
|
||||
multitude of reference measurements are conducted. During the online-phase, where the pedestrian
|
||||
walks along the building, those prior measurements are compared against live readings.
|
||||
The pedestrian's location is inferred using the $k$-nearest neighbor(s) based on the Euclidean distance between currently
|
||||
@@ -21,21 +21,21 @@
|
||||
distorted measurements and thus improve the matching process.
|
||||
|
||||
Despite a very high accuracy due to real-world comparisons, aforementioned approaches suffer from tremendous setup-
|
||||
and maintainance times.
|
||||
and maintenance times.
|
||||
Using robots instead of human workforce to accurately gather the necessary
|
||||
fingerprints might thus be a viable choice \cite{robotFingerprinting}.
|
||||
Being cheaper and more accurate, this technique can also
|
||||
be combined with SLAM for cases where the floorplan is unavailable.
|
||||
|
||||
Besides using real world measurements via fingerprinting, model predictions can be used to determine
|
||||
signal strengths for arbitrary locations. Propagation models are a well established field of research,
|
||||
Besides using real-world measurements via fingerprinting, model predictions can be used to determine
|
||||
signal strengths for arbitrary locations. Propagation models are a well-established field of research,
|
||||
initially used to determine the \docWIFI{}-coverage for new installations.
|
||||
While many of them are intended for outdoor and line-of-sight purposes, they are often applied to indoor use-cases as well
|
||||
\cite{ANewPathLossPrediction, PredictingRFCoverage, empiricalPathLossModel}.
|
||||
|
||||
The model-based approach presented by Chintalapudi et al. \cite{WithoutThePain} works without any prior knowledge.
|
||||
During a setup phase, pedestrians just walk within the building and transmit all observations to a central
|
||||
server. Some GPS fixes with well known position (e.g. entering and leaving the building) observed by the pedestrians
|
||||
server. Some GPS fixes with well-known position (e.g. entering and leaving the building) observed by the pedestrians
|
||||
are used as reference points. A genetic optimization algorithm hereafter estimates both, the parameters for a
|
||||
signal strength prediction model and the pedestrian's locations during the walk. The estimated parameters
|
||||
can be refined using additional walks and may hereafter be used for the indoor localization process.
|
||||
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
We therefore focus on the RSSI, that is available on each commodity smartphone, and use a
|
||||
a simple signal strength prediction model to estimate the most probable location given the phone's observations.
|
||||
simple signal strength prediction model to estimate the most probable location given the phone's observations.
|
||||
Furthermore, we propose a new model based on multiple simple ones, which will reduce the prediction error.
|
||||
Several strategies to optimize simple models and the resulting accuracies are hereafter evaluated and discussed.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user