current TeX
minor code changes
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
|
||||
\section{Conclusion and Future Work}
|
||||
|
||||
\todo{ueberleitung?}
|
||||
|
||||
As denoted within the previous evaluations and discussions, the accuracy of
|
||||
indoor localization systems based on \docWIFI{} depends on a manifold
|
||||
of parameters and even minor adjustments can yield visible improvements.
|
||||
@@ -33,12 +31,19 @@
|
||||
be able to reduce the remaining maximum error, which remains for some locations, at the cost of additional computations.
|
||||
Special data-structures for pre-computation combined with online interpolation might
|
||||
be a viable choice for utmost accuracy that is still able to run on
|
||||
a commodity smartphone in realtime.
|
||||
a commodity smartphone in real-time.
|
||||
|
||||
While we were able to improve the performance of the \docWIFI{} sensor component,
|
||||
the filtering process should be more robust against erroneous observations.
|
||||
Getting stuck should be prevented, independent of minor changes in quality for
|
||||
the signal strength prediction model \cite{todo-toni}.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{cite auf toni?!}
|
||||
|
||||
Our \docWIFI{} quality metric often was able to determine situations that
|
||||
would yield multimodal or bad \docWIFI{} estimations and temporarily
|
||||
ignoring this sensor prevented additional errors. Still, there were some
|
||||
cases where the metric failed to correctly determine a potentially bad
|
||||
observation, which leaves room for future improvements.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
%100 prozent optimierung ist nicht moeglich, es gibt
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user