current code and TeX. code fine?!?!?!
This commit is contained in:
14
tex/chapters/work.tex
Normal file → Executable file
14
tex/chapters/work.tex
Normal file → Executable file
@@ -100,12 +100,12 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[t!]
|
||||
\input{gfx/wifiop_show_optfunc_params}
|
||||
\label{fig:wifiOptFuncTXPEXP}
|
||||
\caption{
|
||||
The average error (in \SI{}{\decibel}) between all reference measurements and corresponding model predictions
|
||||
for one \docAPshort{} dependent on \docTXP{} \mTXP{} and \docEXP{} \mPLE{}
|
||||
[known position $\mPosAPVec{}$, fixed \mWAF{}] denotes a convex function.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:wifiOptFuncTXPEXP}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
For systems that demand a higher accuracy, one can choose a compromise between fingerprinting and
|
||||
@@ -138,12 +138,12 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[t!]
|
||||
\input{gfx/wifiop_show_optfunc_pos_yz}
|
||||
\label{fig:wifiOptFuncPosYZ}
|
||||
\caption{
|
||||
The average error (in \SI{}{\decibel}) between reference measurements and model predictions
|
||||
for one \docAPshort{} dependent on $y$- and $z$-position [fixed $x$, \mTXP{}, \mPLE{} and \mWAF{}]
|
||||
usually denotes a non-convex function with multiple [here: two] local minima.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:wifiOptFuncPosYZ}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
Such functions demand for optimization algorithms, that are able to deal with non-convex functions,
|
||||
@@ -186,6 +186,9 @@
|
||||
axis-aligned bounding box. This approach allows a distinction between in- and outdoor-regions
|
||||
or locations that are expected to highly differ from their surroundings.
|
||||
|
||||
\todo{AP wird in einer region nur dann beruecksichtigt, wenn mindestanzahl an messungen vorhanden ist!}
|
||||
|
||||
\todo{das heißt aber, dass an unterschiedlichen stellen unterschiedlich viele APs verglichen werden. das geht ned. deshalb feste -100}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{\docWIFI{} quality factor}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -243,8 +246,11 @@
|
||||
When scanning for \docAPshort{}s one will thus receive several responses from the same hardware, all with
|
||||
a very small delay (micro- to milliseconds). Such measurements may be grouped using some aggregate
|
||||
function like average, median or maximum.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Furthermore, VAP grouping can be used to suppress unlikely observations: If a physical hardware is known
|
||||
to provide six virtual networks, it is unlikely to only see one of those networks. This is likely due to
|
||||
temporal effects and/or multipath signal propagation and the received signal strength will often be far from
|
||||
the normal average. It thus makes sense to just omit such unlikely observations, focusing on the remaining, stable ones.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user