current TeX
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,7 +3,9 @@
|
||||
|
||||
The \docWIFI{} sensor infers the pedestrian's current location based on a comparison between live observations
|
||||
(the smartphone continuously scans for nearby \docAP{}s) and fingerprints or
|
||||
signal strength predictions for well known locations:
|
||||
signal strength predictions for well known locations. The location that fits the observations best,
|
||||
is the pedestrian's current location. Assuming statistical independence of all transmitters
|
||||
installed within a building, this matching probability can be written as
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
p(\vec{o}_t \mid \vec{q}_t)_\text{wifi} =
|
||||
@@ -11,12 +13,16 @@
|
||||
\prod_{\mRssi_{i} \in \mRssiVec{}} p(\mRssi_{i} \mid \mPosVec),\enskip
|
||||
%\mPos = (x,y,z)^T
|
||||
\mPosVec \in \R^3
|
||||
\enskip ,
|
||||
\label{eq:wifiObs}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
||||
where matching a single signal strength observation against the reference is given by
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
p(\mRssi_i \mid \mPosVec) =
|
||||
\mathcal{N}(\mRssi_i \mid \mu_{i,\mPosVec}, \sigma_{i,\mPosVec}^2)
|
||||
\enskip .
|
||||
\label{eq:wifiProb}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -45,7 +51,9 @@
|
||||
to also serve for indoor purposes.
|
||||
%
|
||||
It predicts an \docAP{}'s signal strength
|
||||
for an arbitrary location $\mPosVec{}$ given the distance between both and two environmental parameters:
|
||||
for an arbitrary location
|
||||
%$\mPosVec{}$
|
||||
given the distance $d$ between both and two environmental parameters:
|
||||
The \docAPshort{}'s signal strength \mTXP{} measurable at a known distance $d_0$ (usually \SI{1}{\meter}) and
|
||||
the signal's depletion over distance \mPLE{}, which depends on the \docAPshort{}'s surroundings like walls
|
||||
and other obstacles.
|
||||
@@ -78,7 +86,7 @@
|
||||
In \refeq{eq:logNormShadowModel}, a constant attenuation factor \mWAF{} is
|
||||
multiplied by the number \numFloors{} of floors/ceilings between sender and the location in question.
|
||||
The attenuation \mWAF{} (per element) depends on the building's architecture and for common,
|
||||
steel enforced concrete floors $\approx 8.0$ is a viable choice \cite{ElectromagneticPropagation}.
|
||||
steel enforced concrete floors $\mWAF \approx \SI{-8.0}{\decibel}$ is a viable choice \cite{ElectromagneticPropagation}.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user