added some comments. more to-do
This commit is contained in:
@@ -51,16 +51,16 @@ they usually suffer from reduced accuracy for large open spaces, as many impleme
|
||||
|
||||
We therefore present a novel technique based on continuous walks along a navigation mesh.
|
||||
Like the graph, the mesh, consisting of triangles sharing adjacent edges,
|
||||
is created once during an offline phase, based on the buildings 3D floorplan.
|
||||
is created once during an offline phase, based on the building's 3D floorplan.
|
||||
Using large triangles reduces the memory footprint dramatically (a few megabytes for large buildings)
|
||||
while still increasing the quality (triangle-edges directly adhere to architectural-edges) and allows
|
||||
for truly continuous transitions along the surface spanned by all triangles.
|
||||
|
||||
%eval - wifi, fingerprinting
|
||||
The outcomes of the state evaluation process depend highly on the used sensors.
|
||||
Most smartphone-based systems are using received signal strength indications (RSSI) given by Wi-Fi or Bluetooth as a source for absolute positioning information.
|
||||
At this, one can mainly differ between fingerprinting and signal-strength prediction model based solutions \cite{Ebner-17}.
|
||||
Indoor localization using Wi-Fi fingerprints was first addressed by \cite{radar}.
|
||||
Most smartphone-based systems are using received signal strength indications (RSSI) given by \docWIFI{} or Bluetooth as a source for absolute positioning information.
|
||||
At this, one can mainly distinguish between fingerprinting and signal-strength prediction model based solutions \cite{Ebner-17}.
|
||||
Indoor localization using \docWIFI{} fingerprints was first addressed by \cite{radar}.
|
||||
During a one-time offline-phase, a multitude of reference measurements are conducted.
|
||||
During the online-phase the pedestrian's location is then inferred by comparing those prior measurements against live readings.
|
||||
Based on this pioneering work, many further improvements where made within this field of research \cite{PropagationModelling, ProbabilisticWlan, meng11}.
|
||||
@@ -70,20 +70,20 @@ Using robots instead of human workforce might thus be a viable choice, still thi
|
||||
%wifi, signal strength
|
||||
Signal strength prediction models are a well-established field of research to determine signal strengths for arbitrary locations by using an estimation model instead of real measurements.
|
||||
While many of them are intended for outdoor and line-of-sight purposes \cite{PredictingRFCoverage, empiricalPathLossModel}, they are often applied to indoor use-cases as well \cite{Ebner-17, farid2013recent}.
|
||||
Besides their solid performance in many different localization solutions, a complex scenario requires a equally complex signal strength prediction model.
|
||||
Besides their solid performance in many different localization solutions, a complex scenario requires an equally complex signal strength prediction model.
|
||||
As described in section 1, historical buildings represent such a scenario and thus the model has to take many different constraints into account.
|
||||
An example is the wall-attenuation-factor model \cite{PathLossPredictionModelsForIndoor}.
|
||||
It introduces an additional parameter to the well-known log distance model \cite{IntroductionToRadio}, which considers obstacles between (line-of-sight) the AP and the location in question by attenuating the signal with a constant value.
|
||||
It introduces an additional parameter to the well-known log-distance model \cite{IntroductionToRadio}, which considers obstacles between (line-of-sight) the access point (AP) and the location in question by attenuating the signal with a constant value.
|
||||
Depending on the use-case, this value describes the number and type of walls, ceilings, floors etc. between both positions.
|
||||
For obstacles, this requires an intersection-test of each obstacle with the line-of-sight, which is costly for larger buildings.
|
||||
Thus \cite{Ebner-17} suggests to only consider floors/ceilings, which can be calculated without intersection checks and allows for real-time use-cases running on smartphones.
|
||||
|
||||
%wifi optimization
|
||||
To further reduce the setup-time, \cite{WithoutThePain} introduces an approach that works without any prior knowledge.
|
||||
They use a genetic optimization algorithm to estimate the parameters for a signal strength prediction, including the access points (AP) position, and the pedestrian's locations during the walk.
|
||||
They use a genetic optimization algorithm to estimate the parameters for a signal strength prediction, including access point positions, and the pedestrian's locations during the walk.
|
||||
The estimated parameters can be refined using additional walks.
|
||||
Within this work we present a similar optimization approach for estimating the AP's location in 3D.
|
||||
However, instead of taking multiple measuring walks, the locations are optimized based only on some reference measurements, what further decreases the setup-time.
|
||||
However, instead of taking multiple measuring walks, the locations are optimized based only on some reference measurements, further decreasing the setup-time.
|
||||
Additionally, we will show that such an optimization scheme can partly compensate for the above abolished intersection-tests.
|
||||
|
||||
%immpf
|
||||
@@ -91,20 +91,21 @@ Besides well chosen probabilistic models, the system's performance is also highl
|
||||
They are often caused by restrictive assumptions about the dynamic system, like the aforementioned sample impoverishment.
|
||||
The authors of \cite{Sun2013} handled the problem by using an adaptive number of particles instead of a fixed one.
|
||||
The key idea is to choose a small number of samples if the distribution is focused on a small part of the state space and a large number of particles if the distribution is much more spread out and requires a higher diversity of samples.
|
||||
The problem of sample impoverishment is then encountered by adapting the number of particles depend upon the systems current uncertainty \cite{Fetzer-17}.
|
||||
The problem of sample impoverishment is then encountered by adapting the number of particles dependent upon the system's current uncertainty \cite{Fetzer-17}.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{ich glaube encountered ist das falsche wort. du willst doch auf 'es wird gefixed' raus, oder? addressed? mitigated?}
|
||||
|
||||
In practice sample impoverishment is often a problem of environmental restrictions and system dynamics.
|
||||
In practice, sample impoverishment is often a problem of environmental restrictions and system dynamics.
|
||||
Therefore, the method above fails, since it is not able to propagate new particles into the state space due to environmental restrictions e.g. walls or ceilings.
|
||||
In \cite{Fetzer-17} we deployed an interacting multiple model particle filter (IMMPF) to solve sample impoverishment in such restrictive scenarios.
|
||||
We combine two particle filter using a non-trivial Markov switching process, depending upon the Kullback-Leibler divergence between both.
|
||||
However, deploying a IMMPF is in many cases not necessary and produces additional processing overhead.
|
||||
Thus a much simpler, but heuristic method is presented within this paper.
|
||||
However, deploying an IMMPF is in many cases not necessary and produces additional processing overhead.
|
||||
Thus, a much simpler, but heuristic method is presented within this paper.
|
||||
|
||||
%estimation
|
||||
Finally, as the name recursive state estimation says, it requires to find the most probable state within the state space, to provide the "best estimate" of the underlying problem.
|
||||
In the discrete manner of a particle representation this is often done by providing a single value, also known as sample statistic, to serve as a best guess \cite{Bullmann-18}.
|
||||
Examples are the weighted-average over all particles or the particle with the highest weight.
|
||||
However in complex scenarios like a multimodal representation of the posterior, such methods fail to provide an accurate statement about the most probable state.
|
||||
However, in complex scenarios like a multimodal representation of the posterior, such methods fail to provide an accurate statement about the most probable state.
|
||||
Thus, in \cite{Bullmann-18} we present a rapid computation scheme of kernel density estimates (KDE).
|
||||
Recovering the probability density function using an efficient KDE algorithm yields a promising approach to solve the state estimation problem in a more profound way.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user