FHWS/IPIN2018
Archived
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

review 01

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
toni
2018-10-21 11:45:55 +02:00
parent 1e19884ed3
commit def7b87ecf
3 changed files with 31 additions and 10 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
tex_review/review/02_review.txt
View File

@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
Dear Reviewer,
-> At first we would like to start with a short overview over all changes. The individual answers follow directly after this text. All additions to the text are highlighted in blue. Words or text passages suggested by the reviewers to be removed are highlighted in red. As you will see, abstract and introduction are completely revised to better highlight the novel contributions. We were able to implement many suggestions of the reviewers. The transition was highly extended, to achieve a better understanding of the method. We have also added a detailed description of how and by what means our system is installed in a building. This also leads to a better description of the experimental setup.
We added a complete new section, evaluating the activity recognition. Additionally, you will find mind smaller changes and addition throughout the paper as well as further improvements of the writing. In the following our answers are marked with "->".
Overall:
From my point of view, it is not clear that this paper represents a novel contribution. Almost all the bases and formulation have been presented in your previous paper (IPIN 2016, FUSION 2016, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2017). Only the KDL optimization and a the trials in a new environment are novels, and they obtained better results due to the floor adaptation of the WAF model.