final abstract
This commit is contained in:
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
|
||||
% Authors, for metadata in PDF
|
||||
\AuthorNames{Toni Fetzer, Frank Ebner, Markus Bullmann, Frank Deinzer and Marcin Grzegorzek}
|
||||
|
||||
\keyword{todo}
|
||||
\keyword{indoor localization; Wi-Fi; PDR; sensor fusion; smartphone; particle filter; sample impoverishment; estimation; historic buildings; navigation mesh}
|
||||
|
||||
% Affiliations / Addresses (Add [1] after \address if there is only one affiliation.)
|
||||
\address{%
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,20 @@
|
||||
\abstract{
|
||||
Abstracttatatata
|
||||
Within this work we present an updated version of our award-winning indoor localization system for smartphones.
|
||||
The current position is given by means of recursive state estimation using a particle filter to incorporate different probabilistic sensor models.
|
||||
Absolute positioning information is given by a comparison between recent Wi-Fi measurements of nearby access-points and signal strength predictions.
|
||||
Instead of using time-consuming approaches like classic fingerprinting or measuring the exact positions of access-points, we use an optimization scheme based on reference measurements to estimate a corresponding Wi-Fi model.
|
||||
To model the pedestrian's movement, which is constraint by walls and other obstacles, we propose a state transition based upon navigation meshes, modelling only the buildings walkable areas.
|
||||
Continuous and smooth floor changes are enabled by using a simple activity recognition.
|
||||
Our rapid computation scheme of the kernel density estimation allows to find an exact estimation of the pedestrian's current position.
|
||||
We further tackle advanced problems like multimodal densities and sample impoverishment (system gets stuck) by introducing different countermeasures, leading to a more robust localization.
|
||||
\newline
|
||||
The goal of this work is to propose a fast to deploy and low-cost localization solution, that
|
||||
provides reasonable results in a high variety of situations.
|
||||
Therefore, we have chosen a very challenging test scenario.
|
||||
All experiments were conducted within a 13th century historic building, formerly a convent and today a museum.
|
||||
The system is evaluated using 28 distinct measurement series on four different test walks, up to \SI{600}{\meter} length and \SI{10}{\minute} duration.
|
||||
It can be shown, that the here presented localization solution is able to provide a small positioning error, even under difficult conditions and faulty measurements.
|
||||
Our advanced filtering methods allow for a real fail-safe system, while the novel optimization scheme enables a setup-time of under \SI{120}{\minute} for the complete building.
|
||||
%We are able to resolve sample impoverishment whenever it occurs and thus provide a real fail-safe system.
|
||||
%finally compare the standard weighted-average estimator with our kernel density approach.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user