FHWS/IPIN2018
Archived
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

writing a little

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
toni
2018-07-10 17:54:03 +02:00
parent 6f588d39cb
commit 9a3715501d
1 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
tex/chapters/experiments.tex
View File

@@ -34,12 +34,15 @@ To make a statement about the performance of our novel transition model presente
\label{sec:exp:opti}
%wie viele ap sind es insgesamt?
The \docAPshort{} positions as well as the fingerprints used for optimization can be seen in fig. \ref{fig:apfingerprint}.
As described in section \ref{sec:wifi} we used \SI{42}{} WEMOS D1 mini to provide a \docWIFI{} infrastructure throughout the building.
The position of every installed beacon was measured using a laser scanner.
This allows a comparison with the optimized \docAPshort{} positions.
Within all Wi-Fi observations, we only consider the beacons, which are identified by their well-known MAC address.
Other transmitters like smart TVs or smartphone hotspots are ignored as they might cause estimation errors.
The position of every installed beacon was measured using a laser scanner.
This allows a comparison with the optimized \docAPshort{} positions.
Fig. \ref{fig:apfingerprint} illustrates the results of the global and the per-floor method for all \docAPshort{}'s installed to ground level.
Fig. compares optimized ap vs real positions for the ground level, thus we only illustrated optimized ap', which are really installed there. red created using the global optimization scheme, blue a optimized only for the rechteckigen ground floor.