added lines to reviews

tex_review/chapters/experiments.tex

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ This took \SI{85}{\minute}, as all measurements were conducted using the same sm
 The optimized Wi-Fi model and the mesh can be created automatically within a negligible amount of time directly on the smartphone, which then enables the pedestrian to start the localization. 
 Of course, for the experiments conducted below several additional knowledge was obtained to evaluate the quality of the proposed methods and the overall localization error. 
 Thus the above provided times were measured for a pure localization installation, as for example a customer would order, while the experiments were performed in a 2-day period.
-Nevertheless, we believe that an on-site setup-time of less than \SI{120}{\minute} is a big step for the practicability of localization systems.  \commentByMarkus{big step is komisch}
+Nevertheless, we believe that an on-site setup-time of less than \SI{120}{\minute} improves the practicability of the localization system, especially in commercial scenarios.
 In addition, the above steps do not require a high level of thoroughness in their execution or special knowledge about the details of the system, which should also allow unbiased persons to set up the system.}
 
 \begin{figure}[t]
@@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ Due to the included sensor noise, they covered a too short distance for several
 Going straightforward to \SI{180} steps, this phenomenon has multiplied for the graph (cf. fig. \ref{fig:transitionEval:d}), but not for the mesh (cf. fig. \ref{fig:transitionEval:c}). 
 This is due to the above-mentioned strategy for the mesh.
 Compared to this approach, the graph is not able to remove any particles and thus they walk according to the recognized steps and heading changes, even if they theoretically hit a wall several times.
-The resulting effects are obvious.  \commentByMarkus{ausformulieren was hier obvious ist}
 After walking up and down twice, several particle groups have formed, which no longer allows an accurate position estimation.
 
 Of course, a similar strategy could be developed for a graph. 
@@ -453,9 +452,8 @@ As a result, they often turned around or a took a few small steps within the sta
 In addition, using only acceleration for detection might be a bad choice in the first place, as moving the phone, e.g. by putting it in the trouser pocket, will exceed the threshold.  
 At the end, this leads to the general question, on how to define standing. 
 Is it a complete standstill or should it allow for a certain degree of freedom? 
-The answer is always the same, it depends. 
-As for this museum scenario, the results for detecting the standing activity are not satisfying and a more advanced approach should be considered.}
-\commentByMarkus{Letzten zwei Sätze wissenschaftlicher machen}
+The answer of this question often depends on the respective scenario. 
+As for the museum, in which visitors often stand in front of exhibits or only move within a small area, the results for detecting the standing activity are not sufficient and a more advanced approach should be considered.}
 
 \add{In contrast, the detection rates for walking up or down are clearly better. 
 With only a single exception in walk 3 (cf. chapter \ref{sec:exp:loc}), the approach makes it possible to direct particles smoothly over stairs.

tex_review/review/02_review.txt

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Figure 6: You use the expression "Monte Carlo", are you referring to Condensatio
 -> Yes, we are referring to a single run of the CONDENSATION particle filter. We fixed it accordingly. 
 
 Results section: results and comments are ad-hoc for this environment, and it is not demonstrated that could be applied in a more general context.
--> We incorporated this suggestion into the conclusion section of this work. Please see line 961 to line 959. However, we have decided not to discuss the general usage of this approach in the experiments, since this work explicitly deals with a historical building. 
+-> We incorporated this suggestion into the conclusion section of this work. Please see line 956 to line 959. However, we have decided not to discuss the general usage of this approach in the experiments, since this work explicitly deals with a historical building. 
 
 
 -> Again, thank you very much for your time and the good suggestions. They further improved this work.

tex_review/review/03_review.txt

@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ Ln 469: "8 cores..." The i7-4702HQ has 4 cores and 8 threads, not 8 cores.
 
 
 Ln 551  - “above are more moderately attenuated” revise.
--> More understandable and correctly formulated in line 718 to 722.
+-> More understandable and correctly formulated in line 716 to 721.
 
 
 Ln 524 - Figure 4 "...xz plane..." should be xy plane
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ Ln 578 “This allows us to discuss everything in detail” – irrelevant or sh
 
 
 Ln 711 -  “The KDE-based estimation illustrates this behavior very accurate” – Revise
--> This sentence was very daring and incomprehensible. We tried to explain the situation in greater detail. Please refer to lines 921 to 935.
+-> This sentence was very daring and incomprehensible. We tried to explain the situation in greater detail. Please refer to lines 927 to 932.
 
 
 Ln 713 – “the teal square” – It is not a square.
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ Ln 720 – “In the end, it is a question of optimal harmony between transition
 
 
 Ln 726 “At the end, in the here shown examples we only searched for a global maxima” – revise english
--> The sentence was fixed in line xxx.
+-> The sentence was fixed in line 947.
 
 
 Ln 733 – “Compared to other state-of-the-art solutions, the setup time is only a few hours and does not require any expert knowledge or hardware.” This comparision is not done in the paper. The authors should be more specific given that this property of the purposed system is declared important, and so should be given with ore detail and (m^2 per hour) and compared with the coverage time of other systems.
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ Ln 733 – “Compared to other state-of-the-art solutions, the setup time is on
 
 
 Ln 754 – “opens up completely new possibilities when” – revise tone of writing. 
--> The sentence was fixed in line xxx.
+-> The sentence was fixed in line 939.
 
 
 -> Again, thank your very much for this very detailed review. Your suggestions have really improved this work and we hope that you are as happy as we are about the result.