FHWS/IPIN2018
Archived
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

added lines to reviews

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
toni
2018-10-21 14:42:47 +02:00
parent 979822de6f
commit 99015bd18c
3 changed files with 8 additions and 10 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
tex_review/review/02_review.txt
View File

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Figure 6: You use the expression "Monte Carlo", are you referring to Condensatio
-> Yes, we are referring to a single run of the CONDENSATION particle filter. We fixed it accordingly.
Results section: results and comments are ad-hoc for this environment, and it is not demonstrated that could be applied in a more general context.
-> We incorporated this suggestion into the conclusion section of this work. Please see line 961 to line 959. However, we have decided not to discuss the general usage of this approach in the experiments, since this work explicitly deals with a historical building.
-> We incorporated this suggestion into the conclusion section of this work. Please see line 956 to line 959. However, we have decided not to discuss the general usage of this approach in the experiments, since this work explicitly deals with a historical building.
-> Again, thank you very much for your time and the good suggestions. They further improved this work.

8
tex_review/review/03_review.txt
View File

@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ Ln 469: "8 cores..." The i7-4702HQ has 4 cores and 8 threads, not 8 cores.
Ln 551 - “above are more moderately attenuated” revise.
-> More understandable and correctly formulated in line 718 to 722.
-> More understandable and correctly formulated in line 716 to 721.
Ln 524 - Figure 4 "...xz plane..." should be xy plane
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ Ln 578 “This allows us to discuss everything in detail” – irrelevant or sh
Ln 711 - “The KDE-based estimation illustrates this behavior very accurate” – Revise
-> This sentence was very daring and incomprehensible. We tried to explain the situation in greater detail. Please refer to lines 921 to 935.
-> This sentence was very daring and incomprehensible. We tried to explain the situation in greater detail. Please refer to lines 927 to 932.
Ln 713 – “the teal square” – It is not a square.
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ Ln 720 – “In the end, it is a question of optimal harmony between transition
Ln 726 “At the end, in the here shown examples we only searched for a global maxima” – revise english
-> The sentence was fixed in line xxx.
-> The sentence was fixed in line 947.
Ln 733 – “Compared to other state-of-the-art solutions, the setup time is only a few hours and does not require any expert knowledge or hardware.” This comparision is not done in the paper. The authors should be more specific given that this property of the purposed system is declared important, and so should be given with ore detail and (m^2 per hour) and compared with the coverage time of other systems.
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ Ln 733 – “Compared to other state-of-the-art solutions, the setup time is on
Ln 754 – “opens up completely new possibilities when” – revise tone of writing.
-> The sentence was fixed in line xxx.
-> The sentence was fixed in line 939.
-> Again, thank your very much for this very detailed review. Your suggestions have really improved this work and we hope that you are as happy as we are about the result.