FHWS/IPIN2018
Archived
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

muss heim und schreib da weiter commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
toni
2018-07-10 18:03:57 +02:00
parent ec9f5b0ace
commit 6aa26d6be8
1 changed files with 10 additions and 12 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

22
tex/chapters/experiments.tex
View File

@@ -44,13 +44,19 @@ Other transmitters like smart TVs or smartphone hotspots are ignored as they mig
The position of every installed beacon was measured using a laser scanner. The position of every installed beacon was measured using a laser scanner.
This allows a comparison with the optimized \docAPshort{} positions. This allows a comparison with the optimized \docAPshort{} positions.
Fig. \ref{fig:apfingerprint} illustrates the results of the global and the per-floor method for all \docAPshort{}'s installed to ground level. Fig. \ref{fig:apfingerprint} illustrates the results of the global and the per-floor method for all \docAPshort{}'s installed to ground level.
%
\begin{figure}[bt]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{gfx/floorplanDummy.png}
\caption{Position of Ap's optimized with global and per floor and real.}
\label{fig:apfingerprint}
\end{figure}
%
It can be seen that the red...
of course, the position alone does not provide sufficient information of the overall performance of the optimiziation since they give no information about the other optimized parameters (bla, blub and bliib).
Fig. compares optimized ap vs real positions for the ground level, thus we only illustrated optimized ap', which are really installed there. red created using the global optimization scheme, blue a optimized only for the rechteckigen ground floor.
of course, the position alone does not provide sufficient information of the overall perfomance of the optimiziation since they give no information about the other optimized parameters (bla, blub and bliib).
Nevertheless, fig. \ref{} gives an idea on how optimizing a simplified signal-strength prediction model behaves. Nevertheless, fig. \ref{} gives an idea on how optimizing a simplified signal-strength prediction model behaves.
By only considering ceillings, the attenuation factore... and thus most z coordinates for the ap's are similiar. By only considering ceillings, the attenuation factore... and thus most z coordinates for the ap's are similiar.
The main message from this is, that wherever the ap's are optimized they are optimized to perfectly fit the underlying signal-strength model. The main message from this is, that wherever the ap's are optimized they are optimized to perfectly fit the underlying signal-strength model.
@@ -64,14 +70,6 @@ looking at the optimziation errors, this can be varified... etc pp
\todo{Vom Journal Paper 2017 noch diese rote optimierungsgrafik. fig 5. Das wäre eigentlich auch echt nicht schlecht. und dazu auch die werte "results from the \todo{Vom Journal Paper 2017 noch diese rote optimierungsgrafik. fig 5. Das wäre eigentlich auch echt nicht schlecht. und dazu auch die werte "results from the
(absolute) difference between model predictions and real-world values for each reference measurement"} (absolute) difference between model predictions and real-world values for each reference measurement"}
\begin{figure}[bt]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{gfx/floorplanDummy.png}
\caption{Position of Ap's optimized with global and per floor and real.}
\label{fig:apfingerprint}
\end{figure}
%kurze beschreibung was wir jetzt alles testen wollen. %kurze beschreibung was wir jetzt alles testen wollen.