added notes
This commit is contained in:
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ Using a MCL you do not need to mix observations and actions in the same concept
|
||||
From my point of view formulation of transition model T should be tackled using actions (steps) and observations (s_wifi) should be used like an observation model V (described like "Evaluation" in section 5).
|
||||
|
||||
line 226: What is z_t? Is an observation o_t? nomenclature should be unified through the whole paper
|
||||
@Frank z_t position genauer beschreiben
|
||||
das nav-mesh geht erstmal nur 2D und das z interpolieren wir
|
||||
das z (höhe) wird ja wirklich vom stockwerk vorgegeben.
|
||||
x,y,z sind alle 3 teil vom state!
|
||||
|
||||
line 319: Are these thresholds able for all of pedestrians? have you tried with different actors and behaviors?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user