FHWS/IPIN2018
Archived
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

transition

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
k-a-z-u
2018-10-16 16:56:25 +02:00
parent 40a0c8cbff
commit 334c237bcf
4 changed files with 59 additions and 36 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
tex_review/review/02_review.txt
View File

@@ -14,10 +14,9 @@ Using a MCL you do not need to mix observations and actions in the same concept
From my point of view formulation of transition model T should be tackled using actions (steps) and observations (s_wifi) should be used like an observation model V (described like "Evaluation" in section 5).
line 226: What is z_t? Is an observation o_t? nomenclature should be unified through the whole paper
@Frank z_t position genauer beschreiben
das nav-mesh geht erstmal nur 2D und das z interpolieren wir
das z (höhe) wird ja wirklich vom stockwerk vorgegeben.
x,y,z sind alle 3 teil vom state!
-> we completely changed the formulation here. z_t is the z-component at time t, which belongs to the state q_t.
it is given be the nav-mesh triangles, which denote the buildings floor.
z_t stays constant, as long as the floor is flat. it only changes when stairs are involved.
line 319: Are these thresholds able for all of pedestrians? have you tried with different actors and behaviors?