added conclusion
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,2 +1,14 @@
|
|||||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
\section{Conclusion}
|
||||||
The conclusion goes here.
|
|
||||||
|
Within this paper a novel approach for rapid computation of the KDE was presented.
|
||||||
|
This is achieved by considering the discrete convolution structure of the BKDE and thus elaborate its connection to digital signal processing, especially the Gaussian filter.
|
||||||
|
Using a box filter as an appropriate approximation results in an efficient computation scheme with a fully linear complexity \landau{N} and a negligible overhead, as confirmed by the utilized experiments.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The analysis of the error showed that the method exhibits an expected error behaviour compared to the BKDE.
|
||||||
|
In terms of calculation time, our approach outperforms other state of the art implementations.
|
||||||
|
Despite being more efficient than other methods, the algorithmic complexity still increases in its exponent with increasing number of dimensions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%future work kurz
|
||||||
|
Finally, such a fast computation scheme makes the KDE more attractive for real time use cases.
|
||||||
|
In a sensor fusion context, the availability of a reconstructed density of the posterior enables many new approaches and techniques for finding a best estimate of the system's current state.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ We arranged a \SI{223}{\meter} long walk within the first floor of a \SI{2500}{m
|
|||||||
%The measurements for the walks were recorded using a Motorola Nexus 6 at 2.4 GHz band only.
|
%The measurements for the walks were recorded using a Motorola Nexus 6 at 2.4 GHz band only.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
Since this work only focuses on processing a given sample set, further details of the localisation system and the described scenario can be looked up in \cite{Ebner17} and \cite{Fetzer17}.
|
Since this work only focuses on processing a given sample set, further details of the localisation system and the described scenario can be looked up in \cite{Ebner17} and \cite{Fetzer17}.
|
||||||
The spacing $\delta$ of the grid was set to \SI{20}{\centimeter} and a state estimation was calculated whenever a step was recognized, about every \SI{500}{\milli \second}.
|
The spacing $\delta$ of the grid was set to \SI{20}{\centimeter} for $x$ and $y$-direction.
|
||||||
|
The bivariate state estimation was calculated whenever a step was recognized, about every \SI{500}{\milli \second}.
|
||||||
%The intention of a real world experiment is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of the here proposed method for finding a best estimate of the pedestrian's position in the wild, compared to conventional used methods like the weighted-average or choosing the maximum weighted particle.
|
%The intention of a real world experiment is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of the here proposed method for finding a best estimate of the pedestrian's position in the wild, compared to conventional used methods like the weighted-average or choosing the maximum weighted particle.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user