Minor changes to wording
This commit is contained in:
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ While such methods are computational fast and suitable most of the time, it is n
|
||||
Especially time-sequential, non-linear and non-Gaussian state spaces, depending upon a high number of different sensor types, frequently suffer from a multimodal representation of the posterior distribution.
|
||||
As a result, those techniques are not able to provide an accurate statement about the most probable state, rather causing misleading or false outcomes.
|
||||
For example, in a localization scenario where a bimodal distribution represents the current posterior, a reliable position estimation is more likely to be at one of the modes, instead of somewhere in-between, like provided by a simple weighted-average estimation.
|
||||
Additionally, in most practical scenarios the sample size and therefore the resolution is limited, causing the variance of the sample based estimate to be high \cite{Verma2003}.
|
||||
Additionally, in most practical scenarios the sample size, and hence the resolution is limited, causing the variance of the sample based estimate to be high \cite{Verma2003}.
|
||||
|
||||
It is obvious, that a computation of the full posterior could solve the above, but finding such an analytical solution is an intractable problem, which is the reason for applying a sample representation in the first place.
|
||||
Another promising way is to recover the probability density function from the sample set itself, by using a non-parametric estimator like a kernel density estimation (KDE).
|
||||
@@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ Nevertheless, the availability of a fast processing density estimate might impro
|
||||
%Therefore, this paper presents a novel approximation approach for rapid computation of the KDE.
|
||||
%In this paper, a well known approximation of the Gaussian filter is used to speed up the computation of the KDE.
|
||||
In this paper, a novel approximation approach for rapid computation of the KDE is presented.
|
||||
The basic idea is to interpret the estimation problem as a filtering operation.
|
||||
The basic idea is to interpret the density estimation problem as a filtering operation.
|
||||
We show that computing the KDE with a Gaussian kernel on binned data is equal to applying a Gaussian filter on the binned data.
|
||||
This allows us to use a well known approximation scheme for Gaussian filters: the box filter.
|
||||
By the central limit theorem, multiple recursion of a box filter yields an approximative Gaussian filter \cite{kovesi2010fast}.
|
||||
This allows us to use a well known approximation scheme based on multiple recursions of a box filter, which yields an approximative Gaussian filter given by the central limit theorem \cite{kovesi2010fast}.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
This process converges quite fast to a reasonable close approximation of the ideal Gaussian.
|
||||
In addition, a box filter can be computed extremely fast by a computer, due to its intrinsic simplicity.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user