Captions & performance bla bla
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,14 +17,14 @@ The bivariate state estimation was calculated whenever a step was recognized, ab
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\input{gfx/walk.tex}
|
||||
\caption{Occurring bimodal distribution, caused by uncertain measurements. After \SI{20.8}{\second}, the distribution gets unimodal. The weigted-average estimation (blue) provides an high error compared to the ground truth (solid black), while the boxKDE approach (green) does not. }
|
||||
\caption{Occurring bimodal distribution, caused by uncertain measurements. After \SI{20.8}{\second}, the distribution gets unimodal. The weigted-average estimation (blue) provides an high error compared to the ground truth (solid black), while the boxKDE approach (orange) does not. }
|
||||
\label{fig:realWorldMulti}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
%
|
||||
Fig. \ref{fig:realWorldMulti} illustrates a frequently occurring situation, where the particle set splits apart, due to uncertain measurements and multiple possible walking directions.
|
||||
This results in a bimodal posterior distribution, which reaches its maximum distances between the modes at \SI{13.4}{\second} (black dotted line).
|
||||
Thus estimating the most probable state using the weighted-average results in the blue line, describing the pedestrian's position to be somewhere outside the building (light green area).
|
||||
In contrast, the here proposed method (green line) is able to retrieve a good estimate compared the the ground truth path shown by the black solid line.
|
||||
In contrast, the here proposed method (orange line) is able to retrieve a good estimate compared the the ground truth path shown by the black solid line.
|
||||
Due to a right turn, the distribution gets unimodal after \SI{20.8}{\second}.
|
||||
This happens since the lower red particles are walking against a wall and thus punished with a low weight.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user