Fixed FE 1
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
|
||||
%As the density estimation poses only a single step in the whole process, its computation needs to be as fast as possible.
|
||||
% not taking to much time from the frame
|
||||
|
||||
Consider a set of two-dimensional samples with associated weights, e.g. presumably generated from a particle filter system.
|
||||
Consider a set of two-dimensional samples with associated weights, \eg{} presumably generated from a particle filter system.
|
||||
The overall process for bivariate data is described in Algorithm~\ref{alg:boxKDE}.
|
||||
|
||||
Assuming that the given $N$ samples are stored in a sequential list, the first step is to create a grid representation.
|
||||
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Such knowledge should be integrated into the system to avoid a linear search ove
|
||||
\Statex
|
||||
|
||||
%\For{$1 \textbf{ to } n$}
|
||||
\Loop{ $n$ \textbf{times}} \Comment{$n$ box filter iterations}
|
||||
\Loop{ $n$ \textbf{times}} \Comment{$n$ separated box filter iterations}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\For{$ i=1 \textbf{ to } G_1$}
|
||||
@@ -51,26 +51,26 @@ Such knowledge should be integrated into the system to avoid a linear search ove
|
||||
\end{algorithm}
|
||||
|
||||
Given the extreme values of the samples and grid sizes $G_1$ and $G_2$ defined by the user, a $G_1\times G_2$ grid can be constructed, using a binning rule from \eqref{eq:simpleBinning} or \eqref{eq:linearBinning}.
|
||||
As the number of grid points directly affects both computation time and accuracy, a suitable grid should be as coarse as possible, but at the same time narrow enough to produce an estimate sufficiently fast with an acceptable approximation error.
|
||||
As the number of grid points directly affects both, computation time and accuracy, a suitable grid should be as coarse as possible, but at the same time narrow enough to produce an estimate sufficiently fast with an acceptable approximation error.
|
||||
|
||||
If the extreme values are known in advanced, the computation of the grid is $\landau{N}$, otherwise an additional $\landau{N}$ search is required.
|
||||
The grid is stored as an linear array in memory, thus its space complexity is $\landau{G_1\cdot G_2}$.
|
||||
|
||||
Next, the binned data is filtered with a Gaussian using the box filter approximation.
|
||||
The box filter width is derived from the standard deviation of the approximated Gaussian, which is in turn equal to the bandwidth of the KDE.
|
||||
The box filter's width is derived by \eqref{eq:boxidealwidth} from the standard deviation of the approximated Gaussian, which is in turn equal to the bandwidth of the KDE.
|
||||
However, the bandwidth $h$ needs to be scaled according to the grid size.
|
||||
This is necessary as $h$ is defined in the input space of the KDE, i.e. in relation to the sample data.
|
||||
This is necessary as $h$ is defined in the input space of the KDE, \ie{} in relation to the sample data.
|
||||
In contrast, the bandwidth of a BKDE is defined in the context of the binned data, which differs from the unbinned data due to the discretisation of the samples.
|
||||
For this reason, $h$ needs to be divided by the bin size to account the discrepancy between the different sampling spaces.
|
||||
|
||||
Given the scaled bandwidth the required box filter width can be computed. % as in \eqref{label}
|
||||
Given the scaled bandwidth the required box filter's width can be computed. % as in \eqref{label}
|
||||
Due to its best runtime performance the recursive box filter implementation is used.
|
||||
If multivariate data is processed, the algorithm is easily extended due to its separability.
|
||||
Each filter pass is computed in $\landau{G}$ operations, however, an additional memory buffer is required.
|
||||
Each filter pass is computed in $\landau{G}$ operations, however, an additional memory buffer is required \cite{dspGuide1997}.
|
||||
|
||||
While the integer-sized box filter requires fewest operations, it causes a larger approximation error due to rounding errors.
|
||||
Depending on the required accuracy the extended box filter algorithm can further improve the estimation results, with only a small additional overhead.
|
||||
Due to its simple indexing scheme, the recursive box filter can easily be computed in parallel using SIMD operations or parallel computation cores.
|
||||
Depending on the required accuracy, the extended box filter algorithm can further improve the estimation results, with only a small additional overhead \cite{gwosdek2011theoretical}.
|
||||
Due to its simple indexing scheme, the recursive box filter can easily be computed in parallel using SIMD operations and parallel computation cores.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, the most likely state can be obtained from the filtered data, i.e. from the estimated discrete density, by searching filtered data for its maximum value.
|
||||
Finally, the most likely state can be obtained from the filtered data, \ie{} from the estimated discrete density, by searching filtered data for its maximum value.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user