feierband. good progress in related work.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -11,57 +11,65 @@ usage of Kalman filters problematic \cite{sarkka2013bayesian, Nurminen2014}.
|
||||
|
||||
All this shows, that sensor models differ in many ways and are a subject in itself.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{sagt man das so? meinst du: haben ihr eigenes forschungsgebiet?}
|
||||
\commentByToni{"Sie sind ein Thema für sich". Glaub schon das man das so sagt. its own theme gibt es noch. find ich aber nicht so fresh}
|
||||
A good discussion on different sensor models can be found in \cite{Yang2015}, \cite{Gu2009} or \cite{Khaleghi2013}.
|
||||
|
||||
\commentByFrank{However, within this work, we use simple models, configured using a handful of parameters
|
||||
and address their inaccuracies by harnassing prior information like the pedestrian's desired destination.}
|
||||
However, in regard of this work, we are not that interested in the different sensor representations but more in
|
||||
the state transition as well as incorporating environmental and navigational knowledge.
|
||||
However, within this work, we use simple models, configured using a handful of parameters and address their inaccuracies by harnessing prior information like the pedestrian's desired destination.
|
||||
Therefore, we are not that interested in the different sensor representations but more in the state transition as well as incorporating environmental and navigational knowledge.
|
||||
|
||||
A widely used and easy method for modelling the movement of a pedestrian, is the prediction of a new position
|
||||
by adding an approximated covered distance to the current position. In most cases, a heading serves as
|
||||
walking direction. If the connection line \commentByFrank{graph? oder generell?: line-of-sight?}
|
||||
walking direction. If the connection line \commentByFrank{graph? oder generell?: line-of-sight?} \commentByToni{ganz generell. deshalb nur connection line. line of sight ist ja mehr blickachse oder sichtlinie}
|
||||
between the new and the old position intersects a wall, the probability for the new position is set to
|
||||
zero \cite{Woodman08-PLF, Blanchert09-IFF}.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{das hatte ich auch mit fast-0 auf der ipin2014. koennen wir auch noch citen}
|
||||
|
||||
zero \cite{Woodman08-PLF, Blanchert09-IFF, Koeping14-ILU}.
|
||||
However, as \cite{Nurminen13-PSI} already stated, it "gives more probability to a short step".
|
||||
\commentByFrank{waende bevorzugen kurze schritte? wird das klar was hier gemeint ist?}
|
||||
An additional drawback of these approaches is that for every transition an intersection-test
|
||||
must be executed. This can result in a high computational complexity.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{ohja.. ipin2014 war brechend langsam}
|
||||
|
||||
These disadvantages can be avoided, from the outset\commentByFrank{??}, by using spatial models
|
||||
like indoor graphs. Regarding modelling approaches, two main classes are inferred: \commentByFrank{richtiges wort hier?}
|
||||
symbolic and geometric spatial models \cite{Afyouni2012}.
|
||||
Especially geometric spatial models (coordinate-based approaches) are very popular,
|
||||
since they integrate metric properties to provide highly accurate location and distance information.
|
||||
One of the most common environmental representations in indoor localization literature is the Voronoi
|
||||
diagram \cite{Liao2003}. It represents the topological skeleton of the building's floorplan as an irregular
|
||||
tessellation of space. In the work of \cite{Nurminen2014} a Voronoi diagram is used to approximate the human
|
||||
movement. It is assumed that the pedestrian can be anywhere on the topological links.
|
||||
The choice probabilities \commentByFrank{??} of changing to the next link are proportional to the total link
|
||||
lengths. However, for highly accurate localisation and large-scale buildings, this network of one-dimensional
|
||||
These disadvantages can be avoided by using spatial models like indoor graphs.
|
||||
Regarding modelling approaches, two main classes can be distinguished: symbolic and geometric spatial models \cite{Afyouni2012}.
|
||||
Especially geometric spatial models (coordinate-based approaches) are very popular, since they integrate metric properties to provide highly accurate location and distance information.
|
||||
One of the most common environmental representations in indoor localization literature is the Voronoi diagram \cite{Liao2003}.
|
||||
It represents the topological skeleton of the building's floorplan as an irregular tessellation of space.
|
||||
This drastically removes degrees of freedom from the map, what results in a low complexity.
|
||||
|
||||
In the work of \cite{Nurminen2014} a Voronoi diagram is used to approximate the human
|
||||
movement.
|
||||
It is assumed that the pedestrian can be anywhere on the topological links.
|
||||
The probabilities of changing to the next link are proportional to the total link lengths.
|
||||
However, for highly accurate localisation and large-scale buildings, this network of one-dimensional
|
||||
curves is not suitable \cite{Afyouni2012}.
|
||||
Therefore, \cite{Hilsenbeck2014} searches for large open spaces (e.g. a lobby) and extends the Voronoi diagram by
|
||||
adding those two-dimensional areas. \commentByFrank{was passsiert hier? wird nicht klar}
|
||||
The final graph is then created by sampling nodes in regular intervals from this structure.
|
||||
Therefore, \cite{Hilsenbeck2014} searches for large open spaces (e.g. a lobby) and extends the Voronoi diagram by adding those two-dimensional areas.
|
||||
The final graph is then created by sampling nodes in regular intervals across the links and filling up the open spaces in a tessellated manner.
|
||||
Similar to \cite{Ebner-15}, they provide a state transition model that selects an edge and a node
|
||||
from the graph according to a sampled distance and heading.
|
||||
|
||||
Nevertheless, most corridors
|
||||
Nevertheless, most corridors are still represented by just one topological link.
|
||||
The complexity is reduced but does not allow arbitrary movements and leads to suboptimal trajectories.
|
||||
Far more flexible and variable geometric spatial models are regular tessellated approaches like grid-based models.
|
||||
Those techniques are trivially implemented, but yet very powerful \cite{Afyouni2012}.
|
||||
Here, a square-shaped or hexagonal grid covers the entire map. Especially in the area of simultaneous localisation and mapping (SLAM), so-called occupancy-grid approaches are very popular \cite{elfes1989using, Thrun2003}.
|
||||
In an occupancy grid, a high probability is assigned to cells within accessible space, while cells occupied by obstacles or walls are less likely.
|
||||
Additionally, every grid cell is able to hold some context information about the environment (e.g. elevators or stairs) or the behaviour of a pedestrian at this particular position (e.g. jumping or running).
|
||||
|
||||
...and walking into a rooms unwahrscheinlich.
|
||||
A similar approach is presented in \cite{Li2010}, \cite{Ebner-15} and is also used within this work.
|
||||
By assuming that the floorplan is given beforehand, the occupied cells can be removed.
|
||||
The remaining cells are described by its centre and represent all free spaces in the indoor environment.
|
||||
A graph is defined by using the centres as nodes and connecting direct neighbours with edges.
|
||||
|
||||
deshalb grided tessellation graph. blabalba for 2D environments. later for 3D ..
|
||||
In order to enable floor changes, some approaches suggest to simply connect the nodes at staircases in a discrete manner \cite{}. However, as mentioned before changing the floor in a discrete does not resemble real-world conditions. Therefore, \cite{} presented a stepwise floor change based on a hexagonal gridded-graph. A similar approach is presented in the here presented approach for a square-shaped grid.
|
||||
|
||||
also hyprid version of both like presented in. they use blabal.. balab
|
||||
|
||||
All this allows a wide range of possibilities for modelling the pedestrian's movement, while only sampling valid locations.
|
||||
|
||||
Computer Games
|
||||
|
||||
Evacuation Route Planning
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
remove degrees of freedom from the map -> less particles
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{State Transition}
|
||||
|
||||
In computer games like the sims or starcraft, intelligent npc movement is a key factor. hierbei geht es nicht nur um das umlaufen von hindernissen sondern auch um eine möglichst natürliche art der bewegung.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -73,15 +81,6 @@ ansätze aus der robotic um einen roboter von a nach b zu schicken
|
||||
|
||||
the idea of using navigational knowledge to simulate the human movement
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Allgemein indoor localizations systeme
|
||||
\subitem was ist state of the art?
|
||||
\subitem klarstellen was wir anders/besser machen
|
||||
\item graphen-basierte systeme
|
||||
\subitem probability graph / transition
|
||||
\item pathfinding for humans
|
||||
\subitem computerspiele machen das schon ewig. robotor auch.
|
||||
\subitem auf menschliches verhalten anpassen. gibt es viele theoritsche ansätze und simulationen aber in noch keinem system.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user