senf zu experimente abgegeben
This commit is contained in:
@@ -11,38 +11,31 @@ Especially the hard problem of pedestrian localisation and navigation has lately
|
||||
|
||||
Most modern indoor localisation systems primarily use smartphones to determine the position of a pedestrian.
|
||||
Especially the phone's inertial measurement unit (IMU) as well as external information like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
|
||||
are used to collect the necessary data. Additionally, environmental knowledge is often incorporated e.g. by using
|
||||
floor maps. This combination of highly different sensor types is also known as sensor fusion.
|
||||
are used to collect the necessary data.
|
||||
Additionally, environmental knowledge is often incorporated e.g. by using floormaps.
|
||||
This combination of highly different sensor types is also known as sensor fusion.
|
||||
|
||||
Here, probabilistic methods like particle- or Kalman filters are often used to approximate a probability
|
||||
distribution describing the pedestrian's possible whereabouts.
|
||||
Here, probabilistic methods like particle- or Kalman filters are often used to approximate a probability distribution describing the pedestrian's possible whereabouts.
|
||||
This procedure can be separated into two probabilistic models:
|
||||
The transition model, which represents the dynamics of the pedestrian
|
||||
and predicts his next accessible locations,
|
||||
and the evaluation model, which estimates the probability for the position also corresponding to
|
||||
The transition model, which represents the dynamics of the pedestrian and predicts his next accessible locations, and the evaluation model, which estimates the probability for the position also corresponding to
|
||||
recent sensor measurements.
|
||||
%Therefore, the most accurate position is represented by a peak of the probability distribution.
|
||||
In our previous work we were able to present such a localisation system based on all the sensors
|
||||
mentioned above, including the phone's barometer \cite{Ebner-15}.
|
||||
In our previous work we were able to present such a localisation system based on all the sensors mentioned above, including the phone's barometer \cite{Ebner-15}.
|
||||
|
||||
In pedestrian navigation, the human movement is subject to the characteristics of walking speed and -direction.
|
||||
Additionally, environmental restrictions need to be considered as well, for example,
|
||||
walking through walls is impossible.
|
||||
Additionally, environmental restrictions need to be considered as well, for example, walking through walls is impossible.
|
||||
Therefore, incorporating environmental knowledge is a necessary and gainful step.
|
||||
Like other systems, we are using a graph-based approach to sample only valid movements.
|
||||
The unique feature of our approach is the way how we model the human movement.
|
||||
This is done by using random walks on a graph, which are based on the heading of the
|
||||
pedestrian.
|
||||
Despite very good results, the system presented in \cite{Ebner-15} suffers from two drawbacks,
|
||||
we want to solve within this work.
|
||||
This is done by using random walks on a graph, which are based on the heading of the pedestrian.
|
||||
Despite very good results, the system presented in \cite{Ebner-15} suffers from two drawbacks, we want to solve within this work.
|
||||
|
||||
First, the transition model of our previous approach uses discrete floor-changes.
|
||||
Although the overall systems provides viable results, it does not resemble real-world floor changes.
|
||||
Especially the barometric sensor is affected due to its continuous pressure measurements.
|
||||
The discrete model prevents the barometer's full potential.
|
||||
It could further be shown that a correct estimation strongly depends on the quality of $z$-transitions.
|
||||
To address this problem we extended the graph by adding realistic stairs, allowing a step-wise transition
|
||||
in the $z$-direction.
|
||||
To address this problem we extended the graph by adding realistic stairs, allowing a step-wise transition in the $z$-direction.
|
||||
|
||||
Second, the heading for modelling the pedestrian's walking behaviour is calculated between two adjacent nodes.
|
||||
This restricts the transition to perform only discrete \SI{45}{\degree} turns. In most scenarios this assumption performs
|
||||
@@ -50,8 +43,7 @@ well, since the... However, walking sharp turns and ... is not
|
||||
\commentByToni{Ich denke hier kann Frank E. noch bissle was schreiben, oder?}
|
||||
\commentByFrank{ja das werde ich noch anpassen, dass es stimmt und die probleme beschreibt}
|
||||
|
||||
To improve the complex problem of localising a person indoors, prior knowledge given by a pedestrian navigation can be used.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{klingt etwas komisch. -- given by a navigation system -- oder sowas in der art?}
|
||||
To improve the complex problem of localising a person indoors, prior knowledge given by a navigation system can be used.
|
||||
Such applications are used to navigate a user to his desired destination.
|
||||
This limits the unpredictability of human movement to a certain degree.
|
||||
So, based on this assumption, the destination is known beforehand and the starting point is the pedestrian's currently estimated position.
|
||||
@@ -63,13 +55,11 @@ Therefore, we present a novel approach that detects walls using the inverted gra
|
||||
|
||||
In order to model areas near walls less likely to be chosen for walking, a probabilistic weight is assigned to every node of the graph.
|
||||
This allows a variety of options for integrating additional knowledge about the environment and enables us to address another problem:
|
||||
\commentByFrank{wie waers mit: entering or leaving rooms is very unlikely as only a few nodes (doors) allow doing so}
|
||||
Walking through a door has a lower probability than remaining on the corridor, since only a few nodes are representing it.
|
||||
Entering or leaving rooms is very unlikely as only a few nodes are representing doors and allow doing so.
|
||||
This can be tackled by making such areas more likely.
|
||||
Therefore, a novel approach for detecting doors using again the inverted graph and the principal component analysis (PCA) \cite{Hotelling1933} is presented within this work.
|
||||
\commentByFrank{auch hier vlt das inverted erstmal noch weg lassen wegen platz}
|
||||
|
||||
\commentByFrank{wenn dir das weighted graph immer noch nicht gefaellt: -- weights attached the nodes -- oder sowas?}
|
||||
Finally, it is now possible to calculate more natural and realistic paths using the weighted graph.
|
||||
We introduce two different methods which make use of the given destination and thereby provide a targeted movement.
|
||||
To the best of our knowledge, this approach is the first one that uses prior navigation knowledge to increase the localisation results.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user