FHWS/Fusion2016
Archived
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

deactivated comments from frank

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
toni
2016-02-23 15:41:56 +01:00
parent 822f71f633
commit 208c0869bf
3 changed files with 19 additions and 19 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
tex/chapters/experiments.tex
View File

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
\SI{70}{\centimeter} with an allowed derivation of \SI{10}{\percent}. The heading deviation in
\refeq{eq:transSimple}, \refeq{eq:transShortestPath} and \refeq{eq:transMultiPath} was \SI{25}{\degree}.
Edges departing from the pedestrian's destination are downvoted using $\mUsePath = 0.9$.
\commentByFrank{$\mUsePath$ erklaert}
%\commentByFrank{$\mUsePath$ erklaert}
As we start with a discrete uniform distribution for $\mStateVec_0$ (random position and heading), the first few estimations
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
\caption{The four paths that were part of the evaluation.
Starting positions are marked with black circles.
For a better visualisation they were slightly shifted to avoid overlapping.}
\commentByFrank{font war korrekt, aber die groesse war zu gross im vgl. zu den anderen}
%\commentByFrank{font war korrekt, aber die groesse war zu gross im vgl. zu den anderen}
\label{fig:paths}
\end{figure}
% error development over time while walking along a path
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
When leaving the suggested route (3), the error of \textbf{shortest} path \refeq{eq:transShortestPath}
and \textbf{multi}path \refeq{eq:transMultiPath} increases.
The same issues arise when facing multimodalities between two staircases just before the destination (9).}
\commentByFrank{hilft das bold vlt. schon um die legende zu verstehen?}
%\commentByFrank{hilft das bold vlt. schon um die legende zu verstehen?}
\label{fig:errorTimedNexus}
\end{figure}
% detailed analysis of path 4
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
\input{gfx/eval/error_dist_nexus}
\caption{Error distribution of all walks conducted with the Motorola Nexus 6 for distinct percentile values.
Our proposed methods clearly provide an enhancement for the overall localization process.}
\commentByFrank{percentile erwaehnt}
%\commentByFrank{percentile erwaehnt}
\label{fig:errorDistNexus}
\end{figure}
%\begin{figure}
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@
depicts the error development for several percentile values. As can be seen, adding prior
knowledge is able to improve the localisation for all examined situations, even when
leaving the suggested path or when facing bad/slow sensor readings.
\commentByFrank{fig. \ref{fig:errorDistNexus} erwaehnt}
%\commentByFrank{fig. \ref{fig:errorDistNexus} erwaehnt}
% error values
\begin{table}