Added plots as pgfplots
This commit is contained in:
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Due to the rarity of this problem we decided to repeat these faulty experiment r
|
||||
The access points are Intel NUCs running a patched Linux to enable FTM support.
|
||||
In total we're using eight APs based on Intel WiFi cards.
|
||||
Four of them are based on Intel Dualband-Wireless-AC~8260 cards configured as described by \etal{Ibrahim} \cite{ibrahim2018verification}.
|
||||
The remaining four are based on Intel Wireless-AC~9462 modules and run a recent Linux kernel where the iwlwifi driver and hostapd are already prepared to support FTM.
|
||||
The remaining four are based on Intel Wireless-AC~9462 modules and run a recent Linux kernel 5.3.7 where the iwlwifi driver and hostapd are already prepared to support FTM.
|
||||
However, the driver still requires small manual changes, as a global boolean flag needs to be set to activate the FTM related code.
|
||||
In addition, the firmware of the card returns that the chip is not calibrated for FTM.
|
||||
As a consequence the driver disables FTM responder functionality.
|
||||
@@ -172,20 +172,23 @@ Both the \pixelBoth produce similar results, but the \pixelOld tends to underest
|
||||
Opposed to \etal{Ibrahim} \cite{ibrahim2018verification} findings no single constant offset which significantly improves the measurements across all device combinations could be found in our tests.
|
||||
However, the overall error of the device combinations is reasonable small and its distribution is mostly Gaussian-like, which justifies the basic applicability of the technique and devices for indoor positioning.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[ht]
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{minipage}{.5\textwidth}
|
||||
\begin{figure}[ht]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\subfloat[]{\label{fig:DistMeasMeanNucPixel:a}\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{DistMeasMeanPerPixel.png}}
|
||||
\end{minipage}%
|
||||
\begin{minipage}{.5\textwidth}
|
||||
\begin{minipage}{.45\textwidth}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\subfloat[]{\label{fig:DistMeasMeanNucPixel:b}\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{DistMeasMeanPerNuc.png}}
|
||||
\subfloat[]{\label{fig:DistMeasMeanNucPixel:a}\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/MeanDistPixel.pgf}}
|
||||
\end{minipage}\hspace{.09\textwidth}
|
||||
\begin{minipage}{.45\textwidth}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\subfloat[]{\label{fig:DistMeasMeanNucPixel:b}\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{plots/MeanDistIntel.pgf}}
|
||||
\end{minipage}\par\medskip
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\subfloat[CDF of error]{\label{fig:DistMeasMeanNucPixel:c}\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{DistMeasCDF.png}}
|
||||
|
||||
\caption{my fig}
|
||||
\subfloat[]{\label{fig:DistMeasMeanNucPixel:c}%
|
||||
\input{plots/DistErrorCdf.pgf}%
|
||||
%\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,axisratio=2.3]{plots/DistErrorCdf.pgf}%
|
||||
}
|
||||
\caption{\ref{fig:DistMeasMeanNucPixel:a}, \ref{fig:DistMeasMeanNucPixel:b} show the mean distance per smartphone and per access point, respectively. \ref{fig:DistMeasMeanNucPixel:c} is the CDF of the measurement error for each device combination.}
|
||||
\label{fig:DistMeasMeanNucPixel}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user